-
[ 목차 ]
1.
As a general rule, it’s better if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way in which the term is ordinarily used in the kinds of debates to which your claims are pertinent.
일반적으로, 당신의 정의가 당신의 주장과 관련된 논쟁에서 그 용어가 일반적으로 사용되는 방식에 최대한 가깝게 일치하는 것이 더 좋다.
2.
There will be, however, occasions where it is appropriate, even necessary, to coin special uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition.
그러나 때로는 철학자들이 ‘자극적 정의’라고 부르는 방식을 통해 특별한 용법을 만드는 것이 적절하거나 심지어 필요할 때도 있다.
3.
This would be the case where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions that you think are philosophically important.
이것은 현재의 어휘가 당신이 철학적으로 중요하다고 생각하는 구분을 할 수 없을 때 해당된다.
4.
For example, we do not have a term in ordinary language that describes a memory that is not necessarily a memory of something the person having it has experienced.
예를 들어, 우리가 일상 언어에서 가지고 있는 용어 중에는 그 기억을 가진 사람이 반드시 경험한 것이 아닌 기억을 설명하는 용어가 없다.
5.
Such a thing would occur, for example, if I could somehow share your memories;
예를 들어, 내가 어떻게든 당신의 기억을 공유할 수 있다면 이런 일이 일어날 수 있다.
6.
I would have a memory-type experience, but this would not be of something that I had actually experienced.
나는 기억과 유사한 경험을 하겠지만, 그것은 내가 실제로 경험한 것이 아닐 것이다.
7.
To call this a memory would be misleading.
이것을 기억이라고 부르는 것은 오해를 불러일으킬 것이다.
8.
For this reason, philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi-memory’ to refer to these hypothetical memory-like experiences.
이러한 이유로, 철학자들은 이러한 가상의 기억 유사 경험을 가리키기 위해 ‘준기억(quasi-memory)’이라는 특별한 용어를 만들었다.
접속사가 많은 지문은
무조건
순서, 삽입은 확실히 알아놓아야 함
이지문에서 전치사 + 관계대명사 확인
As a general rule, / it’s better [if your definition corresponds as closely as possible to the way [in which the term is ordinarily used /in the kinds of debates [to which your claims are pertinent]]].
There will be, / however, / occasions [where it is appropriate, even necessary, / to coin special uses through what philosophers call stimulative definition].
This would be the case [where the current lexicon is not able to make distinctions [that (you think)] are philosophically important].
For example, / we do not have a term in ordinary language [that describes a memory [that is not necessarily a memory of something [the person / having it/ has experienced]]].
현재분사 확인!
Such a thing would occur, / for example, / if I could somehow share your memories;
I would have a memory-type experience, / but this would not be of something [that I had actually experienced].
To call this a memory would be misleading.
For this reason, / philosophers have coined the special term ‘quasi-memory’ / to refer to these hypothetical memory-like experiences.